I'm considering a finder as well. Originally, I planned on a finder/plotter to keep track of spots on lakes since water levels have changed so much in recent years (the lakes will look much different when they get filled back up.) When fishing the local harbors, it's nice having a buddy that knows the one I go to most, as well as using multiple landmarks he tells me to look for. It is good enough for now. But, I can see having water temps and being able to see drop offs as a major benefit. By the way, he uses a Fishin Buddy 120. Compact, simple, AA battery powered, side finding, convenient and portable all-in-one solution but, not color - doesn't seem like a big deal though.
filippodg wrote:Np. Glad I could help.
Honestly, all of these basic FFs are just plng 'n play. Yes, you could mess w/ the settings a bit more but there isn't too much to it. Just mount, turn it on, and it'll start reading. You'll mainly be paying attention to depth and structure. Structure is the most important one and with time you'll memorize your favorite spots and won't even need your FF anymore at those locations. I now take mine only to places I've never been to.
There's no need to spend $200 for a basic FF that does the same thing the Elite does. I'll spend more for one that has true image capabilities (like an x-ray) where it literally scans the bottom and you can see all sort of details, like the Garmin Echo 551dv ($250).
Here's a quick intro to the Elite 3x:
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]And here's more info:
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]Just save $, learn how to "read" it, and upgrade in the future.
filippodg - would you happen to know the current draw on the 3x? Neither links nor Lowrance's own literature specify it. I think it could help in selecting a proper battery for run time and maybe selecting a battery on physical size. Keeping this link handy for reference:
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] fatfingers wrote:would it be worth it to pay the extra $29 for the Elite-3x DSI
filippodg wrote:In my opinion, yes! Especially for $30. With DSI (DownScan Imaging), you go from a "video game" looking screen to a more realistic image (x-ray) of what's right below you -- can't beat that! You'll be able to distinguish every structure (trees, rocks, etc.), in real detail, from real fish to live bait.
Or spend the extra $150 and get the Garmin Echo 551dv ($250 -- 5" color screen) and you'll be set for a very, very long time!
But even with the Elite you'll be set for a long time, until you wanna spend serious cash on a multi-functional FF. You'll be happy either way.
Please correct me if I am wrong, the 3x DSI only has down scan imaging and no sonar view. I'm still learning but as far as I understand, while DSI will have a clearer representation of the structure, it will not have the accuracy, of sonar, in identifying fish. I am still reseaching the PirahnaMAX 197 DI which I believe has both views and comes in at your proposed budget. But, I do like the ability to view V in the display of the 3x, something I do not think the PirahnaMAX has or maybe something I overlooked.
I'm hoping for Christmas that all the finders come out with a little larger screen (heck, cell phones have bigger, clearer screens.) Would be nice to see bluetooth connectivity to my phone, unless smartwatches become more water resistant or waterproof. (I know, I know. Phones off when fishing. It's like a 2-stroke penalty or having to buy drinks after the round if your phone rings in the middle of a backswing on the tee.
)